South Somerset Local Plan Review 2016-2036 Preferred Options Consultation (Regulation 18)

List Comments

Search for Comments

Order By
in order

770 comments.

List of comments
RespondentResponse DateDetails
C G Fry and Son Ltd 11 Dec 2019

South Somerset Local Plan Review 2016-2036 Preferred Options Consultation (Regulation 18) Market Towns Land east of Shudrick Lane Text Block

  • Comment ID: 1367
We support the inclusion of Policy IM2 in the Preferred Options Local Plan Review for the development of 220 dwellings at Shudrick Lane. As we set out in our previous representations, the site is located immediately adjacent to the built up area of Ilminster and is within walking distances from the range of services and facilities within the town centre. The site therefore presents an opportunity for the delivery of sustainable development which will contribute to the meeting housing needs of th
BWaddell 17 Oct 2019

South Somerset Local Plan Review 2016-2036 Preferred Options Consultation (Regulation 18) Market Towns Land east of Shudrick Lane Text Block

  • Comment ID: 519
SOUTH SOMERSET LOCAL PLAN REVIEW 2016-2036 .PREFERRED OPTIONS CONSULTATION RESPONSE - OBJECTION TO IM2 SHUDRICK VALLEY. I am against the inclusion of IM2 as an Option for development in the Local Plan Review - Preferred Options. If IM2 is adopted this over-development will destroy the character and setting of the town, the very essence of what makes Ilminster. The evidence has not been taken into account correctly and the consultation is unsound, therefore option IM2 is unsound. It is inconcei
J North 17 Oct 2019

South Somerset Local Plan Review 2016-2036 Preferred Options Consultation (Regulation 18) Market Towns Land east of Shudrick Lane Text Block

  • Comment ID: 518
SOUTH SOMERSET LOCAL PLAN REVIEW 2016-2036 .PREFERRED OPTIONS CONSULTATION RESPONSE - OBJECTION TO IM2 SHUDRICK VALLEY. I am against the inclusion of IM2 as an Option for development in the Local Plan Review - Preferred Options. If IM2 is adopted this over-development will destroy the character and setting of the town, the very essence of what makes Ilminster. The evidence has not been taken into account correctly and the consultation is unsound, therefore option IM2 is unsound. It is inconcei
LouisaTurner 17 Oct 2019

South Somerset Local Plan Review 2016-2036 Preferred Options Consultation (Regulation 18) Market Towns Land east of Shudrick Lane Text Block

  • Comment ID: 517
SOUTH SOMERSET LOCAL PLAN REVIEW 2016-2036 .PREFERRED OPTIONS CONSULTATION RESPONSE - OBJECTION TO IM2 SHUDRICK VALLEY. I am against the inclusion of IM2 as an Option for development in the Local Plan Review - Preferred Options. If IM2 is adopted this over-development will destroy the character and setting of the town, the very essence of what makes Ilminster. The evidence has not been taken into account correctly and the consultation is unsound, therefore option IM2 is unsound. It is inconcei
GaryTurner 17 Oct 2019

South Somerset Local Plan Review 2016-2036 Preferred Options Consultation (Regulation 18) Market Towns Land east of Shudrick Lane Text Block

  • Comment ID: 516
SOUTH SOMERSET LOCAL PLAN REVIEW 2016-2036 .PREFERRED OPTIONS CONSULTATION RESPONSE - OBJECTION TO IM2 SHUDRICK VALLEY. I am against the inclusion of IM2 as an Option for development in the Local Plan Review - Preferred Options. If IM2 is adopted this over-development will destroy the character and setting of the town, the very essence of what makes Ilminster. The evidence has not been taken into account correctly and the consultation is unsound, therefore option IM2 is unsound. It is inconcei
H North 17 Oct 2019

South Somerset Local Plan Review 2016-2036 Preferred Options Consultation (Regulation 18) Market Towns Land east of Shudrick Lane Text Block

  • Comment ID: 515
SOUTH SOMERSET LOCAL PLAN REVIEW 2016-2036 .PREFERRED OPTIONS CONSULTATION RESPONSE - OBJECTION TO IM2 SHUDRICK VALLEY. I am against the inclusion of IM2 as an Option for development in the Local Plan Review - Preferred Options. If IM2 is adopted this over-development will destroy the character and setting of the town, the very essence of what makes Ilminster. The evidence has not been taken into account correctly and the consultation is unsound, therefore option IM2 is unsound. It is inconcei
G Harvey 17 Oct 2019

South Somerset Local Plan Review 2016-2036 Preferred Options Consultation (Regulation 18) Market Towns Land east of Shudrick Lane Text Block

  • Comment ID: 514
SOUTH SOMERSET LOCAL PLAN REVIEW 2016-2036 .PREFERRED OPTIONS CONSULTATION RESPONSE - OBJECTION TO IM2 SHUDRICK VALLEY. I am against the inclusion of IM2 as an Option for development in the Local Plan Review - Preferred Options. If IM2 is adopted this over-development will destroy the character and setting of the town, the very essence of what makes Ilminster. The evidence has not been taken into account correctly and the consultation is unsound, therefore option IM2 is unsound. It is inconcei
K L Webb 17 Oct 2019

South Somerset Local Plan Review 2016-2036 Preferred Options Consultation (Regulation 18) Market Towns Land east of Shudrick Lane Text Block

  • Comment ID: 513
SOUTH SOMERSET LOCAL PLAN REVIEW 2016-2036 .PREFERRED OPTIONS CONSULTATION RESPONSE - OBJECTION TO IM2 SHUDRICK VALLEY. I am against the inclusion of IM2 as an Option for development in the Local Plan Review - Preferred Options. If IM2 is adopted this over-development will destroy the character and setting of the town, the very essence of what makes Ilminster. The evidence has not been taken into account correctly and the consultation is unsound, therefore option IM2 is unsound. It is inconcei
J Steven 16 Oct 2019

South Somerset Local Plan Review 2016-2036 Preferred Options Consultation (Regulation 18) Market Towns Land east of Shudrick Lane Text Block

  • Comment ID: 749
SOUTH SOMERSET LOCAL PLAN REVIEW 2016-2036 .PREFERRED OPTIONS CONSULTATION RESPONSE - OBJECTION TO IM2 SHUDRICK VALLEY. I am against the inclusion of IM2 as an Option for development in the Local Plan Review. If IM2 is adopted this over-development will destroy the character and setting of the town, the very essence of what makes Ilminster. The evidence has not been taken into account correctly and the consultation is unsound, therefore option IM2 is unsound. It is incomprehensible that SSDC
L Logsdon 16 Oct 2019

South Somerset Local Plan Review 2016-2036 Preferred Options Consultation (Regulation 18) Market Towns Land east of Shudrick Lane Text Block

  • Comment ID: 667
SOUTH SOMERSET LOCAL PLAN REVIEW 2016-2036 .PREFERRED OPTIONS CONSULTATION RESPONSE - OBJECTION TO IM2 SHUDRICK VALLEY. I am against the inclusion of IM2 as an Option for development in the Local Plan Review. If IM2 is adopted this over-development will destroy the character and setting of the town, the very essence of what makes Ilminster. The evidence has not been taken into account correctly and the consultation is unsound, therefore option IM2 is unsound. It is incomprehensible that SSDC
Next pageLast page