South Somerset Local Plan Review 2016-2036 Preferred Options Consultation (Regulation 18)

List Comments

Search for Comments

Order By
in order

2 comments.

List of comments
RespondentResponse DateDetails
concernedMP 16 Sep 2019

South Somerset Local Plan Review 2016-2036 Preferred Options Consultation (Regulation 18) Rural Centres (no name)

  • Comment ID: 792
Of the two sites identified in the Preferred options paper (and underlying HELAA map) in Milborne Port, the site at Wheathill should be favoured to take forward, and the site at Court lane should be dismissed as unsustainable. The site at Wheathill lane is contiguous to land that has recently been approved and found to be sustainable development. This site will be sufficient to meet all Milborne Ports Residual Housing requirement, after newly approved sites are taken into account (see comments
«anonymous» 30 Aug 2019

South Somerset Local Plan Review 2016-2036 Preferred Options Consultation (Regulation 18) Rural Centres (no name)

  • Comment ID: 414
We write on behalf of our client Redcliffe Homes, who have an option to develop land at Wheathill Way, Milborne Port for housing. The site area extends to 1.55ha as outlined on the Landscape Constraints Plan at Appendix A. Preliminary master planning work and analysis suggests that the site has capacity to accommodate up to 40 dwellings. 1.2 It should also be noted that planning permission has now been granted for 65 homes at Station Road, Milborne Port (Ref: 17/03985/OUT (identified as Policy