South Somerset Local Plan Review 2016-2036 Preferred Options Consultation (Regulation 18)

List Comments

Search for Comments

Order By
in order

4 comments.

List of comments
RespondentResponse DateDetails
Frances Gully - SCC Education 18 Sep 2019

South Somerset Local Plan Review 2016-2036 Preferred Options Consultation (Regulation 18) Market Towns Infrastructure Text Block

  • Comment ID: 1966
7.173 - There is an identified need for early years, primary & secondary, as there is insufficiency in the existing education infrastructure. It would help if Education infrastructure was included here. We can provide evidence if required.
Environment Agency 18 Sep 2019

South Somerset Local Plan Review 2016-2036 Preferred Options Consultation (Regulation 18) Market Towns Infrastructure Text Block

  • Comment ID: 2018
Langport and Huish Episcopi Two residential allocations. Both are in FZ1 (low) and well above flood levels. Paragraph 7.174 – Planning permission granted on the Westover Trading Estate for raising of the road, additional flood risk mitigation required – EA has considered an embankment scheme? Not clear whether this is still a consideration.
Frances Gully - SCC Education 18 Sep 2019

South Somerset Local Plan Review 2016-2036 Preferred Options Consultation (Regulation 18) Market Towns Infrastructure Text Block

  • Comment ID: 1965
7.153 - Do you mean AC4 as below? Also new school at Torbay rd would include a nursery so should be referenced.
Huish Episcopi Parish Clerk 10 Sep 2019

South Somerset Local Plan Review 2016-2036 Preferred Options Consultation (Regulation 18) Market Towns Infrastructure Text Block

  • Comment ID: 616
Infrastructure * 173 The Infrastructure Delivery Plan identifies several infrastructure issues that are considered 'necessary'to support development at Langport and Huish Episcopi,which generally relate to open space and sports facilities.One of the specific infrastructure requirements are improvements to the community hall. We don't have one! We would like you to refer to the last paragraph in our letter to the Spatial Policy Team, South Somerset District Council, The Council Offices dated 4t