PROPOSED SUBMISSION SOUTH SOMERSET LOCAL PLAN 2006-2028 - EXAMINATION SUSPENSION: PROPOSED MAIN MODIFICATIONS NOVEMBER 2013

List Comments

Search for Comments

Order By
in order

39 comments.

List of comments
RespondentResponse DateDetails
J Croker 03 Jan 2014

Consultation Document Sustainability Appraisal, Habitats Regulation Assessment and Equality Analysis Sustainability Appraisal SA

  • Comment ID: 260
- We agree with the Town Council that Ilminster has become unbalanced. The direction of growth should be eastward as otherwise the town centre will die & Ilminster will become a dormitory town. - SSDC repeatedly submitted inaccurate Shudrick Lane maps to Planning Inspector. This should have shown a smaller area on the south slope to lessen the impact on Pretwood Hill. - Sustainability scores used by SSDC are inaccurate. The data cannot be trusted & is being challenged. - The residents of Shud
JSnelling 02 Jan 2014

Consultation Document Sustainability Appraisal, Habitats Regulation Assessment and Equality Analysis Sustainability Appraisal SA

  • Comment ID: 467
In response to the Planning Inspector's letter which reveal the unsoundness of the SSDC's Local Plan the Council wrote back and gave him an under taking that they would carry out an 'Independent' review of the Local Plan and that review would be carried out by Independent Consultants. Enfusion were engaged and then briefed by the Council however in briefing Enfusion the SSDC told these Consultants not to look at at over 50°/o of possible areas of potential development around Yeovil. Many of the
SPowell 02 Jan 2014

Consultation Document Sustainability Appraisal, Habitats Regulation Assessment and Equality Analysis Sustainability Appraisal SA

  • Comment ID: 230
I agree with the evidence in the Sustainability Appraisal and support the main modification for Ilminster direction of growth to be Canal Way. I also fully agree with the District Council decision to remove Shudrick Valley as the preferred option I believe that Canal Way is the most sustainable option, and a more suitable site, both in continuing the development in an area where new build properties have already been added, and also taking advantage of the existing arterial road network at the
Sue Neave 02 Jan 2014

Consultation Document Sustainability Appraisal, Habitats Regulation Assessment and Equality Analysis Sustainability Appraisal SA

  • Comment ID: 232
I totally agree with the evidence in the Sustainability Appraisal and fully support the main modification for Ilminster's direction of growth to be Canal Way. I also fully agree with the District Council decision to remove Shudrick Valley as the preferred option.
L Luscombe 02 Jan 2014

Consultation Document Sustainability Appraisal, Habitats Regulation Assessment and Equality Analysis Sustainability Appraisal SA

  • Comment ID: 241
I wish to object to the Proposed Main Modifications to the Proposed Submission South Somerset Local Plan 2006 - 2028. The modification which I object to is the change from a Single Sustainable Urban Extension Site to the South of Yeovil, to two smaller sites, one to the North and the other to the South of Yeovil. The Planning Inspector had four areas of concern which correctly needed to be revisited. The reappraisal of the evidence by Effusion highlighted the fact that there is no position aro
A Drayton 24 Dec 2013

Consultation Document Sustainability Appraisal, Habitats Regulation Assessment and Equality Analysis Sustainability Appraisal SA

  • Comment ID: 169
Main modification Ilminster.  Paragraph: 3. Policy: PMT3 Ilminster. Proposals Inset Map: Figure 3.2 Ilrninster. Legally compliant: Yes. Sound: Yes. I agree with the evidence in the Sustainability Appraisal and support the main modification for Ilminster direction of growth to be Canal Way. I also fully agree with the District Council decision to remove Shudrick Valley as the preferred option.
E Albin 24 Dec 2013

Consultation Document Sustainability Appraisal, Habitats Regulation Assessment and Equality Analysis Sustainability Appraisal SA

  • Comment ID: 165
I agree with the evidence in the Sustainability Appraisal and support the main modification for Illminster direction of growth  to be Canal Way. I also fully agree with the District Council's decision to remove Shudrick Valley as the preferred option.
West Dorset District Council/W… 19 Dec 2013

Consultation Document Sustainability Appraisal, Habitats Regulation Assessment and Equality Analysis Sustainability Appraisal SA

  • Comment ID: 110
West Dorset District Council would like to respond as follows, though please note that this is an officer response, agreed in discussion with the Leader, which will be considered by the Executive Committee on 14 January. I shall let you know if any changes are made at the meeting. The committee report is also attached. It is noted that the Sustainability Appraisal report refers not only to this council's opposition to the proposal, but also to uncertainty around potential infrastructure provisi
J M Lumley 16 Dec 2013

Consultation Document Sustainability Appraisal, Habitats Regulation Assessment and Equality Analysis Sustainability Appraisal SA

  • Comment ID: 1048
I refer you to the "National Planning Policy Framework" re:- your modifications both being unsound:- Re Legal Compliance and Re Soundness of proposed main modification. Also - It was indeed "Unfortunate" that there was a printing error on some of the comments forms - ie Printing the "ODD" pages and missing out "EVEN pages".  This error says it all! More waste of time and money by our planning office!
First pagePrevious page