PROPOSED SUBMISSION SOUTH SOMERSET LOCAL PLAN 2006-2028 - EXAMINATION SUSPENSION: PROPOSED MAIN MODIFICATIONS NOVEMBER 2013

Comment ID 813
Document Section Consultation Document Sustainability Appraisal, Habitats Regulation Assessment and Equality Analysis Sustainability Appraisal SA View all on this section
Respondent h.best123@btinternet.com View all by this respondent
Response Date 10 Jan 2014
Do you consider the Proposed Main Modification is Legally Compliant?
Do you consider the Proposed Main Modification is Sound?
If you have responded that the Proposed Main Modification is unsound, do you consider the Proposed Main Modification is unsound because it is:
Comment

5 CPRE welcomes the acceptance by SSDC that the proposed development at East Coker would destroy Best & Most Versatile (BMV) farmland as well as affect heritage assets and landscape. SSDC seeks to reduce the overall loss by cutting the number of new dwellings on greenfield land from 2,500 (of which 935 would in any case have applied to the next Plan period) to 1,565, of which 800 would be at East Coker and 765 at Mudford. It is understood that much of the Mudford site is BMV land, though perhaps of a lower grading than at East Coker.

What changes do you suggest to make the Proposed Main Modifications legally compliant or sound?
If your representation is seeking a change, do you consider it necessary to participate at the oral part of the examination?
If you wish to participate at the oral part of the examination, please outline why you consider this to be necessary:
Attachments