PROPOSED SUBMISSION LOCAL PLAN 2006-2028 - Aug 12

List Comments

Search for Comments

Order By
in order

3 comments.

List of comments
RespondentResponse DateDetails
Rob Boyden 10 Aug 2012

Proposed Submission Local Plan 2006-2028 Yeovil - Vision and Proposals What should the Local Plan deliver? East Coker and North Coker Buffer Zone East Coker and North Coker Buffer Zone and Policy YV3

  • Comment ID: 1400
Objection 7. The proposed 'Buffer Zone' for East Coker has no legal status and is therefore not sustainable.
Rob Boyden 10 Aug 2012

Proposed Submission Local Plan 2006-2028 Yeovil - Vision and Proposals What should the Local Plan deliver? Yeovil Airfield Flight Safety Zone Yeovil Airfield Flight Safety Zone and Policy YV5

  • Comment ID: 1401
Objection 8. Options for Policy YV5 'Yeovil Airfield flight safety zone' have not been explored thoroughly or imaginatively. The Local Plan is intended as a long term plan and yet this policy is dictated by immediate needs. The airfield is critical to AgustaWestland's (AW) current operation but is an anachronism that should be challenged whilst improving AWs future competivity. The opportunity of relocating AWs flight test activity to the much bigger airfield at Yeovilton should be explored. A s
Rob Boyden 10 Aug 2012

Proposed Submission Local Plan 2006-2028 Yeovil - Vision and Proposals What should the Local Plan deliver? Yeovil Sustainable Urban Extension Future Masterplanning Future Masterplanning and Policy YV2

  • Comment ID: 1399
I object to the proposed Local plan, in particular the Yeovil Urban Extension, for the following reasons: Objection 1. The figures used in the evidence base are out of date and based on 2008 figures. Documents in the evidence base such as the Economic Profile of Yeovil March 2010 cast doubt on the growth figures and the scale and depth of the recession has become even clearer since then. More recent figures from the ONIS could have been used by SSDC if there had been the will, The NPPF states t