PROPOSED SUBMISSION LOCAL PLAN 2006-2028 - Aug 12

List Comments

Search for Comments

Order By
in order

1 comment.

List of comments
RespondentResponse DateDetails
Matt Horsley 31 Jul 2012

Proposed Submission Local Plan 2006-2028 Settlement Strategy Settlement Hierarchy Rural Settlements Local services and facilities Local services and facilities

  • Comment ID: 256
I object to the Yeovil Urban Extension on the basis that it is direct conflict with Paragraphs 4.41 and 4.42 of the Local Plan. The Urban Extension will threaten the viability of the local services and facilities of East Coker and this has not been taken account in the Local Plan or the Sustainability Appraisal. The closure of services and facilities within East Coker will result in villagers having to use vehicles to perform day-to-day activities. It will also leave those who do not drive, and