PROPOSED SUBMISSION LOCAL PLAN 2006-2028 - Aug 12

List Comments

Search for Comments

Order By
in order

51 comments.

List of comments
RespondentResponse DateDetails
Rob Boyden 10 Aug 2012

Proposed Submission Local Plan 2006-2028 Yeovil - Vision and Proposals What should the Local Plan deliver? East Coker and North Coker Buffer Zone East Coker and North Coker Buffer Zone and Policy YV3

  • Comment ID: 1400
Objection 7. The proposed 'Buffer Zone' for East Coker has no legal status and is therefore not sustainable.
Mrs L A Bennett 10 Aug 2012

Proposed Submission Local Plan 2006-2028 Yeovil - Vision and Proposals What should the Local Plan deliver? East Coker and North Coker Buffer Zone East Coker and North Coker Buffer Zone and Policy YV3

  • Comment ID: 1883
As owner of the 22 acres of land at Greggs Riding School East Coker and Proprietor and Chief instructor of the school, I am writing to reiterate that my land be included in the Urban Extension. I particularly request that my fields grid ref ST538143 and ST539143 are removed from the Buffer zone (as they do not 'buffer' the development from East Coker) the main reason identified for the Buffer Zone. They are, I gather included to allow us to accommodate the use of the land for the Riding School
E Bennett 10 Aug 2012

Proposed Submission Local Plan 2006-2028 Yeovil - Vision and Proposals What should the Local Plan deliver? East Coker and North Coker Buffer Zone East Coker and North Coker Buffer Zone and Policy YV3

  • Comment ID: 2233
Objection: Certain fields within the East Coker and North Coker Buffer Zone, as suggested in Policy YV3 do not meet the criteria laid out in Policy YV3 and associated paragraphs. Request: The fields listed below (also see attached sketch) are removed from the East Coker and North Coker Buffer Zone and included within the Yeovil Sustainable Urban Extension, specifically those with the following OS Map sheet reference and National Grid field number: * OS Map sheet reference: ST53 14, National Gr
Cllr M Fysh 10 Aug 2012

Proposed Submission Local Plan 2006-2028 Yeovil - Vision and Proposals What should the Local Plan deliver? East Coker and North Coker Buffer Zone East Coker and North Coker Buffer Zone and Policy YV3

  • Comment ID: 2347
Without prejudice to my view that an urban extension is not required and if held to be so it should and cannot be justified to be in the Civil Parish of East Coker, and that adverse environmental cannot be mitigated except if development is very limited and small scale, as the parish has evolved for thousands of years, I support the concept of a buffer zone but it should be much more in terms of policy and should be much larger in size,extending right acroos to protect Pavyotts Mill and Key Farm
Cllr M Fysh 10 Aug 2012

Proposed Submission Local Plan 2006-2028 Yeovil - Vision and Proposals What should the Local Plan deliver? East Coker and North Coker Buffer Zone East Coker and North Coker Buffer Zone and Policy YV3

  • Comment ID: 1944
Without prejudice to my view that an urban extension is not required and if held to be so it should and cannot be justified to be in the Civil Parish of East Coker, and that adverse environmental cannot be mitigated except if development is very limited and small scale, as the parish has evolved for thousands of years, I support the concept of a buffer zone but it should be much more in terms of policy and should be much larger in size,extending right acroos to protect Pavyotts Mill and Key Farm
BHartley 10 Aug 2012

Proposed Submission Local Plan 2006-2028 Yeovil - Vision and Proposals What should the Local Plan deliver? East Coker and North Coker Buffer Zone East Coker and North Coker Buffer Zone and Policy YV3

  • Comment ID: 2093
For the reasons set out in this submission I am of the view that the Local Plan fails the NPPF tests of soundness. 1. The establishment of a buffer zone is welcomed as a principle of: (a) Recognising that rural communities have an intrinsic right to be protected from urban development (b) Establishing a formal protective zone limiting urban development. 2. The terminology of words "buffer zone" may appear to have connotations of the term RURAL BUFFER: "AVOIDING COALESCENCE WITH SETTLEMENTS (
Cllr M Fysh 10 Aug 2012

Proposed Submission Local Plan 2006-2028 Yeovil - Vision and Proposals What should the Local Plan deliver? East Coker and North Coker Buffer Zone East Coker and North Coker Buffer Zone and Policy YV3

  • Comment ID: 2348
Without prejudice to my view that an urban extension is not required and if held to be so it should and cannot be justified to be in the Civil Parish of East Coker, and that adverse environmental cannot be mitigated except if development is very limited and small scale, as the parish has evolved for thousands of years, I support the concept of a buffer zone but it should be much more in terms of policy and should be much larger in size,extending right acroos to protect Pavyotts Mill and Key Farm
BHartley 10 Aug 2012

Proposed Submission Local Plan 2006-2028 Yeovil - Vision and Proposals What should the Local Plan deliver? East Coker and North Coker Buffer Zone East Coker and North Coker Buffer Zone and Policy YV3

  • Comment ID: 2094
For the reasons set out in this submission I am of the view that the Local Plan fails the NPPF tests of soundness. 1. The establishment of a buffer zone is welcomed as a principle of: (a) Recognising that rural communities have an intrinsic right to be protected from urban development (b) Establishing a formal protective zone limiting urban development. 2. The terminology of words "buffer zone" may appear to have connotations of the term RURAL BUFFER: "AVOIDING COALESCENCE WITH SETTLEMENTS (
Martyn Sowerbutts 10 Aug 2012

Proposed Submission Local Plan 2006-2028 Yeovil - Vision and Proposals What should the Local Plan deliver? East Coker and North Coker Buffer Zone East Coker and North Coker Buffer Zone and Policy YV3

  • Comment ID: 1294
The East Coker and North Coker Buffer Zone was contrived in haste by SSDC in an attempt to mitigate the considerable impact of the Urban Extension on the Civil Parish of East Coker. In no way is the area a "village green" space and so the underlying intention of NPPF 77, 78 is not relevant. The land bounded by the proposed Buffer Zone consists of, inter alia, Prime agricultural land, private gardens, North Coker House (Grade 2 listed) estate, North Coker Conservation Area, a large proportion of
Cllr M Fysh 10 Aug 2012

Proposed Submission Local Plan 2006-2028 Yeovil - Vision and Proposals What should the Local Plan deliver? East Coker and North Coker Buffer Zone East Coker and North Coker Buffer Zone and Policy YV3

  • Comment ID: 2349
Without prejudice to my view that an urban extension is not required and if held to be so it should and cannot be justified to be in the Civil Parish of East Coker, and that adverse environmental cannot be mitigated except if development is very limited and small scale, as the parish has evolved for thousands of years, I support the concept of a buffer zone but it should be much more in terms of policy and should be much larger in size,extending right acroos to protect Pavyotts Mill and Key Farm
Next pageLast page