PROPOSED SUBMISSION LOCAL PLAN 2006-2028 - Aug 12

List Comments

Search for Comments

Order By
in order

3 comments.

List of comments
RespondentResponse DateDetails
J Edmondson 10 Aug 2012

Proposed Submission Local Plan 2006-2028 Rural Centres - Vision and Proposals Ilchester Local Aspirations Ilchester - Local Aspirations

  • Comment ID: 855
A further comment against 7.21: Where is the record of this consultation? During the earlier consultation period for the Core Strategy, Ilchester Parish Council's comments were submitted by the parish clerk, but not in accordance with the precise formal requirements of the consultative process. SSDC advised after the closing date that the comments were discounted. It would have been nice if SSDC had advised the clerk on the correct process while there was still time. The comments submitted by t
Somerset County Council Enviro… 08 Aug 2012

Proposed Submission Local Plan 2006-2028 Rural Centres - Vision and Proposals Ilchester Local Aspirations Ilchester - Local Aspirations

  • Comment ID: 2173
Para. 7.21 "Consultation with Ilchester Parish Council has identified that the volume of traffic travelling through the settlement is an issue, together with parking and they have indicated concern in relation to the continuing viability of shops and commercial businesses in the town centre." This is not a 'local aspiration'.
J Edmondson 05 Aug 2012

Proposed Submission Local Plan 2006-2028 Rural Centres - Vision and Proposals Ilchester Local Aspirations Ilchester - Local Aspirations

  • Comment ID: 355
Ilchester - local aspirations. 1. It is true the Parish Council said traffic and parking are issues. What you failed to report is that the Parish Council stated that there is no practicable solution to solving these problems. 2. The Parish Council has never at any time expressed concern about the continuing viability of the local businesses. This view has been expressed only by the SSDC Ward Member.