PROPOSED SUBMISSION LOCAL PLAN 2006-2028 - Aug 12

Comment ID 213
Document Section Proposed Submission Local Plan 2006-2028 Spatial Portrait of South Somerset Health and Well Being Health and Well Being View all on this section
Respondent Matt Horsley View all by this respondent
Response Date 30 Jul 2012
Do you consider the DPD is Legally Compliant? No
Do you consider the DPD is Sound? No
If you have responded that the DPD is unsound, Do you consider the DPD is unsound because it is:
  • Not Consistent with national policy
Comment

I object to the Yeovil Urban Extension on the basis that it will affect the health and well being of the residents of East Coker.  The Plan and Sustainability Appraisal does not assess the impact on the Urban Extension on the East Coker services such as the Village Store and East Coker Primary School.  It is envisioned that as the Urban Extension will have its own shops and schools, there will be a significant negative impact on those of East Coker.

What changes do you suggest to make the DPD legally compliant or sound?
If your representation is seeking a change, do you consider it necessary to participate at the oral part of the examination? No
If you wish to participate at the oral part of the examination, please outline why you consider this to be necessary:
Attachments