PROPOSED SUBMISSION LOCAL PLAN 2006-2028 - Aug 12

Comment ID 348
Document Section Proposed Submission Local Plan 2006-2028 Housing Empty Properties Empty Properties View all on this section
Respondent Matt Horsley View all by this respondent
Response Date 04 Aug 2012
Do you consider the DPD is Legally Compliant? No
Do you consider the DPD is Sound? No
If you have responded that the DPD is unsound, Do you consider the DPD is unsound because it is:
  • Not Effective
Comment

I object to the Local Plan on the grounds that it is not putting a high enough priority on using empty properties first before building new ones.

What changes do you suggest to make the DPD legally compliant or sound?
If your representation is seeking a change, do you consider it necessary to participate at the oral part of the examination? No
If you wish to participate at the oral part of the examination, please outline why you consider this to be necessary:
Attachments