PROPOSED SUBMISSION LOCAL PLAN 2006-2028 - Aug 12

Comment ID 460
Document Section Proposed Submission Local Plan 2006-2028 Market Towns - Vision and Proposals Primary Market Towns - Ilminster Spatial Portrait Ilminster - Spatial Portrait View all on this section
Respondent Barbara Anderson View all by this respondent
Response Date 07 Aug 2012
Do you consider the DPD is Legally Compliant? No
Do you consider the DPD is Sound? No
If you have responded that the DPD is unsound, Do you consider the DPD is unsound because it is:
  • Not Justified
Comment

I OBJECT TO OPTION 1.  The Council's seemingly deliberate obfuscation of the reasons for changing Option 2 to Option 1 seems to indicate a hidden agenda.  Until this is clarified Option 1 should not go ahead. 

Preserve the beauty of Shudrick Valley.

What changes do you suggest to make the DPD legally compliant or sound? Proper democratic consultation of interested parties.
If your representation is seeking a change, do you consider it necessary to participate at the oral part of the examination? No
If you wish to participate at the oral part of the examination, please outline why you consider this to be necessary:
Attachments