PROPOSED SUBMISSION LOCAL PLAN 2006-2028 - Aug 12
View Comment
| Comment ID | 497 |
|---|---|
| Document Section | Proposed Submission Local Plan 2006-2028 Housing Housing View all on this section |
| Respondent | P Benham View all by this respondent |
| Response Date | 08 Aug 2012 |
| Do you consider the DPD is Legally Compliant? | |
| Do you consider the DPD is Sound? | No |
| If you have responded that the DPD is unsound, Do you consider the DPD is unsound because it is: |
|
| Comment | Too much office jargon in this statement on housing policy. What is a sustainable house? One that won't fall down next week? No building can be described as sustainable if it destroys land that could be used for growing food. What is a balanced community? All ages: rich and poor? In other words any community anywhere. What a load of empty rubbish. More useful to talk about refurbishing the large number of empty properties that could be made available. |
| What changes do you suggest to make the DPD legally compliant or sound? | Use Plain English and explain and justify the reasoning behind the proposals, whether from legal obligation, Government or EU directive, etc. |
| If your representation is seeking a change, do you consider it necessary to participate at the oral part of the examination? | No |
| If you wish to participate at the oral part of the examination, please outline why you consider this to be necessary: | |
| Attachments |