PROPOSED SUBMISSION LOCAL PLAN 2006-2028 - Aug 12

Comment ID 587
Document Section Proposed Submission Local Plan 2006-2028 Market Towns - Vision and Proposals Primary Market Towns - Ilminster Spatial Portrait Ilminster - Spatial Portrait View all on this section
Respondent gordon james View all by this respondent
Response Date 08 Aug 2012
Do you consider the DPD is Legally Compliant? No
Do you consider the DPD is Sound? No
If you have responded that the DPD is unsound, Do you consider the DPD is unsound because it is:
  • Not Justified
Comment

    I OPPOSE the proposal to change the development from Option2 to Option 1 on the grounds of insufficient consultation with the majority of the electorate of Ilminster. The town council have been patently opaque in pursuing a proved to be unnecessary "Bypass" by professionals, ie Atkins.  

Development should be towards the main transport links to the centres of employment, ie Exeter , Taunton, Yeovil etc, and utilise the existing and available brown-field site.

What changes do you suggest to make the DPD legally compliant or sound? Proper democratic consultation
If your representation is seeking a change, do you consider it necessary to participate at the oral part of the examination? No
If you wish to participate at the oral part of the examination, please outline why you consider this to be necessary:
Attachments