PROPOSED SUBMISSION LOCAL PLAN 2006-2028 - Aug 12

Comment ID 635
Document Section Proposed Submission Local Plan 2006-2028 Spatial Portrait of South Somerset Health and Well Being Health and Well Being View all on this section
Respondent Brian Jacobs View all by this respondent
Agent Brian Jacobs
Response Date 09 Aug 2012
Do you consider the DPD is Legally Compliant?
Do you consider the DPD is Sound? No
If you have responded that the DPD is unsound, Do you consider the DPD is unsound because it is:
  • Not Justified
Comment

"5.34 In undertaking this work it became clear that a buffer zone for East Coker and North Coker would be required"

Demonstrates inappropriateness of nominating South and West Option as ideal for sustainable development.

What changes do you suggest to make the DPD legally compliant or sound? Be realistic and practice claims made for sustainable future.
Embrace under used areas of Pen Mill and River Yeo.
If your representation is seeking a change, do you consider it necessary to participate at the oral part of the examination? Yes
If you wish to participate at the oral part of the examination, please outline why you consider this to be necessary: Justification for selected location of the Urban Village and Sustainable Urban Extension to Yeovil is unsound.
Attachments