PROPOSED SUBMISSION LOCAL PLAN 2006-2028 - Aug 12
View Comment
| Comment ID | 348 |
|---|---|
| Document Section | Proposed Submission Local Plan 2006-2028 Housing Empty Properties Empty Properties View all on this section |
| Respondent | Matt Horsley View all by this respondent |
| Response Date | 04 Aug 2012 |
| Do you consider the DPD is Legally Compliant? | No |
| Do you consider the DPD is Sound? | No |
| If you have responded that the DPD is unsound, Do you consider the DPD is unsound because it is: |
|
| Comment | I object to the Local Plan on the grounds that it is not putting a high enough priority on using empty properties first before building new ones. |
| What changes do you suggest to make the DPD legally compliant or sound? | |
| If your representation is seeking a change, do you consider it necessary to participate at the oral part of the examination? | No |
| If you wish to participate at the oral part of the examination, please outline why you consider this to be necessary: | |
| Attachments |