South Somerset Local Plan Review 2016-2036 Preferred Options Consultation (Regulation 18)

List Comments

Search for Comments

Order By
in order

24 comments.

List of comments
RespondentResponse DateDetails
CMiller 18 Sep 2019

South Somerset Local Plan Review 2016-2036 Preferred Options Consultation (Regulation 18) Market Towns Employment Text Block

  • Comment ID: 1286
I am deeply concerned by the proposals set out in the Local Plan for Crewkerne. First, let me correct the classification of Crewkerne as a Primary Market Town, the weekly market currently consists of one fish van. It would appear from the Settlement Map that the proposed development would equal in area the size of the existing town, which is not feasible. The current infrastructure could not bear it. As it is the roads, particularly South Street, East Street and Market Street are already highl
TLenihan 18 Sep 2019

South Somerset Local Plan Review 2016-2036 Preferred Options Consultation (Regulation 18) Market Towns Employment Text Block

  • Comment ID: 597
I am a resident of Easthams Road and would like to raise my concerns / opinions regarding the proposed development known as CR5 . Would you please be able to explain how you are going to manage the following during the construction process : Traffic Management - Access and egress to works area Working hours and duration of project Vibration / movement of existing properties and structures Ecology - Known to have badgers , deer & nesting birds Pollution - Dust , noise & light Safety - Scre
N Lunt 18 Sep 2019

South Somerset Local Plan Review 2016-2036 Preferred Options Consultation (Regulation 18) Market Towns Employment Text Block

  • Comment ID: 1360
A large part of the proposed increase for Crewkerne would be in the large development HG1. This is seen as a key site because it comes with improved transport infrastructure. Within this context we have the allocation of land at CR2 and CR5. These two plots are part of an important 'green lung' (rather than the slightly sniffy 'something of a green lung' as given in the preferred options document) which has long been identified by the Town Council. This complete area brings the countryside rig
Puk Johansen 17 Sep 2019

South Somerset Local Plan Review 2016-2036 Preferred Options Consultation (Regulation 18) Market Towns Employment Text Block

  • Comment ID: 1676
I am a mum who live with my family in Easthams Road in Crewkerne. I would like to bring to you my concerns regarding the proposed development of our surrounding green areas (CR2 and CR5) When I sit in my garden, I have the field of the proposed CR5 development below me. Up till now we seen multiple wild birds in the field, such as Owls, kestrels, buzzards, great tits, blue tits, long tailed tits, green woodpeckers, wrens, sparrows and many more. I also know that this field houses several badger
catherine@collierplanning.co.uk 17 Sep 2019

South Somerset Local Plan Review 2016-2036 Preferred Options Consultation (Regulation 18) Market Towns Employment Text Block

  • Comment ID: 1097
Crewkerne Our previous representations supported the allocation of land identified in the Issues and Options report as 'CREW 3' for housing growth as it forms a logical extension to the existing built up area and is very well located to existing services and facilities, being the closest option site to the town centre and access could be provided via the existing industrial estate to the south. In the Issues and Options Preferred Options Consultation Report dated February 2019, the Council stat
English Heritage South West (R… 17 Sep 2019

South Somerset Local Plan Review 2016-2036 Preferred Options Consultation (Regulation 18) Market Towns Employment Text Block

  • Comment ID: 1114
CR2 and CR5 Crewkerne Land at LAND REAR OF PENLAIN and POLICY CR5 - EMPLOYMENT GROWTH AT REAR OF CROPMEAD TRADING ESTATE, CREWKERNE This site is current green open fields – referred to as the green open lung. The proposals are quite intensive, 100 units and will erode the interaction between the town and its surrounding rural hinterland. Edge of CA, number of listed buildings around including some highly although unlikely to be greatly affected.
KW 17 Sep 2019

South Somerset Local Plan Review 2016-2036 Preferred Options Consultation (Regulation 18) Market Towns Employment Text Block

  • Comment ID: 1679
East St and Easthams Rd I wish to take this opportunity to object to the proposed developments CR2 and CR5 on the following grounds:- CR5 has previously been designated as recreational land which, upon completion of the CLR 525 property development would provide a perfect part of the green wedge, taking many pedestrians and cyclists out of their vehicles and off the A30 East Street. CR5 would also provide accessible green space for those with restricted mobility as it is fairly flat and, coupl
English Heritage South West (R… 17 Sep 2019

South Somerset Local Plan Review 2016-2036 Preferred Options Consultation (Regulation 18) Market Towns Employment Text Block

  • Comment ID: 1476
CR2 and CR5 Crewkerne Land at LAND REAR OF PENLAIN and POLICY CR5 - EMPLOYMENT GROWTH AT REAR OF CROPMEAD TRADING ESTATE, CREWKERNE This site is current green open fields – referred to as the green open lung. The proposals are quite intensive, 100 units and will erode the interaction between the town and its surrounding rural hinterland. Edge of CA, number of listed buildings around including some highly although unlikely to be greatly affected.
Crewkerne Resident 16 Sep 2019

South Somerset Local Plan Review 2016-2036 Preferred Options Consultation (Regulation 18) Market Towns Employment Text Block

  • Comment ID: 210
I object to the proposal to develop land that has already been allocated for formal and informal recreational use (KS/CREW/7 & KS/CREW/8) CR2 and CR3 offer the ideal opportunity to link the CLR site with Crewkerne town centre. There could be a footpath and cycle way through an extensive green wedge, thus improving the sustainability credentials of the allocated housing site by reducing the need to travel, improving health and wellbeing, improving access to open spaces, as well as improving the
MNebel 16 Sep 2019

South Somerset Local Plan Review 2016-2036 Preferred Options Consultation (Regulation 18) Market Towns Employment Text Block

  • Comment ID: 390
I would like to raise a formal objection to the above proposasl on behalf of Crewkerne Rugby Club. The club is a vital community asset with in excess of 250 members that rely on 365 day/yr access to the pitches and container storage at Henhayes. Building on the surrounding areas highlighted in your proposal will cause further challenges for the club and therefore the community due to * Enhanced drainage challenges through surface water runoff on a pitch that already holds water in the winter;
Next pageLast page